Digraph vs Am I Cited pricing
| Plan detail | Digraph | Am I Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published price | Free for 14 days, then $99/mo | €50/mo |
| Plan and billing | Standard, billed monthly | Starter |
| Allowance | 30 prompts, 1 brand | 50 credits, 1 domain |
| AI coverage | Supported AI models | Credit-based runs |
| Next plan | Pro $249/mo: 300 prompts, 3 brands | See Am I Cited’s pricing page |
Lowest published plan for each vendor; billing terms differ. See which AI systems Digraph checks and how.
Features compared
| Capability | Digraph | Am I Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Entry plan and billing unit | Standard: $99/month for 30 tracked prompts and 1 brand. | Starter: €50/month; 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, 1 domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain. |
| What a tracked unit means | Plan allowances are expressed as tracked prompts and brands; supported AI models are included on Standard and Pro. | Am I Cited says one AI response is one prompt run on one engine and costs 0.015 credits; its prompt and response ceilings are separate limits. |
| Next self-serve plan | Pro: $249/month for 300 prompts and 3 brands. | Pro: €120/month; 120 credits, up to 8,000 AI responses, 5 domains, and up to 800 prompts per domain. |
| AI-engine scope and schedule | Pricing lists supported AI models on Standard and Pro. | The pricing page lists 8 engines; Starter has no daily prompt schedule, while Pro and higher list daily schedules. |
| Broader workflow | Digraph Pro lists audits, analysis, Signal, and agent modules. | Am I Cited also presents Search Console/Bing data, SEO reporting, content/article generation, MCP, and agent workflows; check which actions consume credits. |
Key differences between Digraph and Am I Cited
Am I Cited positions AI-answer visibility alongside broader search-performance, content, and agent workflows. Its pricing page meters actions in credits and lists response ceilings, domains, and prompt allowances. Digraph publishes prompt and brand limits and supported AI models on Standard and Pro. A fair comparison should normalize the prompt × engine runs, schedule, domains or brands, currency, and features the team needs.
Normalize credits, responses, prompts, and engines
Am I Cited’s pricing page lists €50/month for Starter, 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, one domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain. It defines one AI response as one prompt run on one engine, costing 0.015 credits. Digraph lists prompts and brands directly: 30 prompts/one brand on Standard and 300 prompts/three brands on Pro. Do not equate 3,000 responses to a prompt count; multiply the prompt set by engines, markets, and measurement cadence you actually need.
Compare engine breadth and refresh schedule at the selected tier
Am I Cited’s pricing page lists eight engines and says Starter has no daily schedule; daily schedules are listed on Pro and higher. Digraph lists supported AI models on Standard and Pro. Verify the exact engine names, prompt × engine sampling, and schedule for the chosen plan. Also compare the currencies and annual commitments rather than converting a headline price into an unsupported value-for-money claim.
Include the adjacent SEO and execution workflows
Am I Cited describes a broader suite with search-performance reporting, content tools, MCP, and agents, while Digraph Pro lists audits, analysis, Signal, and agents alongside monitoring. Map the work your team needs beyond measurement—Search Console, content production, reporting, and approvals—and ask which plan includes it and whether it consumes credits. The public product descriptions are vendor claims, not independent evidence of ranking gains.
Run a controlled evaluation
Use the same prompt set, engines, market, language, competitor list, and time period. Record the total prompt × engine runs, actual answers captured, citation fields, credit consumption, schedule, exports, and brands/domains supported. Choose based on the measured workload and evidence your team can inspect, not by comparing non-equivalent headline limits.
Need the work done, not another tool?
A tracking tool tells you where you stand in AI answers; it does not write the content, fix the site or earn the mentions that change them. Digraph is an AI marketing agency: we measure on our own platform and do that work for you, starting with a one-off audit.
See our AEO agency servicesHow to evaluate both
This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 15, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Am I Cited lists Starter at €50/month with 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, one domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain; its pricing page says one prompt run on one engine costs 0.015 credits. It lists eight engines and no daily schedule on Starter. Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and one brand, and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and three brands, with supported model APIs on both. Credits, responses, prompts, currencies, and engine schedules are different units; compare the effective measurement workload before drawing value conclusions.
Sources reviewed
Am I Cited’s capabilities are summarized from the official sources below. This is a documentation-based comparison published by Digraph, not a hands-on benchmark.
Common questions
How does Digraph compare with Am I Cited?
Am I Cited positions AI-answer visibility alongside broader search-performance, content, and agent workflows. Its pricing page meters actions in credits and lists response ceilings, domains, and prompt allowances. Digraph publishes prompt and brand limits and supported AI models on Standard and Pro. A fair comparison should normalize the prompt × engine runs, schedule, domains or brands, currency, and features the team needs.
How does Am I Cited pricing compare with Digraph?
Am I Cited’s lowest published plan is €50/mo (Starter) with 50 credits, 1 domain and credit-based runs. Digraph starts with a 14-day free trial; Standard is then $99/mo billed monthly for 30 prompts, 1 brand across supported model APIs, and Pro is $249/mo for 300 prompts, 3 brands. Billing basis, collection surfaces, and plan units differ, so confirm current terms with both vendors.
Is Digraph a good Am I Cited alternative?
Digraph is a fit for teams evaluating a broad search and AI visibility suite with credit-metered response volume against a prompt-and-brand-based AI answer workflow. Run the same buyer prompts in both products and compare the full answers, citations, and next actions before deciding.
Can Digraph complement an existing Am I Cited workflow?
Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph adds an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools SEO, brand, and content teams already use.
How should I run a fair AI visibility evaluation?
Use the same prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period in each tool. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before choosing a workflow.