All comparisons

Digraph vs Am I Cited

Am I Cited positions AI-answer visibility alongside broader search-performance, content, and agent workflows. Its pricing page meters actions in credits and lists response ceilings, domains, and prompt allowances. Digraph publishes prompt and brand limits and nine AI systems on Standard and Pro. A fair comparison should normalize the prompt × engine runs, schedule, domains or brands, currency, and features the team needs.

Abstract network showing connected sources and answer intelligence
Answer evidence, connected

At a glance

Teams evaluating a broad search and AI visibility suite with credit-metered response volume against a prompt-and-brand-based AI answer workflow.

CapabilityDigraphAm I Cited
Entry plan and billing unitStandard: $99/month for 30 tracked prompts and 1 brand.Starter: €50/month; 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, 1 domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain.
What a tracked unit meansPlan allowances are expressed as tracked prompts and brands; all 9 listed AI systems are included on Standard and Pro.Am I Cited says one AI response is one prompt run on one engine and costs 0.015 credits; its prompt and response ceilings are separate limits.
Next self-serve planPro: $249/month for 300 prompts and 3 brands.Pro: €120/month; 120 credits, up to 8,000 AI responses, 5 domains, and up to 800 prompts per domain.
AI-engine scope and schedulePricing lists 9 AI systems on Standard and Pro.The pricing page lists 8 engines; Starter has no daily prompt schedule, while Pro and higher list daily schedules.
Broader workflowDigraph Pro lists audits, analysis, Signal, and agent modules.Am I Cited also presents Search Console/Bing data, SEO reporting, content/article generation, MCP, and agent workflows; check which actions consume credits.

Run a useful side-by-side evaluation

This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 15, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Am I Cited lists Starter at €50/month with 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, one domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain; its pricing page says one prompt run on one engine costs 0.015 credits. It lists eight engines and no daily schedule on Starter. Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and one brand, and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and three brands, with nine listed AI systems on both. Credits, responses, prompts, currencies, and engine schedules are different units; compare the effective measurement workload before drawing value conclusions.

Published by Digraph. Competitor capabilities are summarized from the official sources below, reviewed on . This is a product-documentation comparison, not a hands-on benchmark. Confirm current plan limits and coverage with each provider.

Review Digraph’s documented features and AI search visibility evaluation guide before building your shortlist.

Normalize credits, responses, prompts, and engines

Am I Cited’s pricing page lists €50/month for Starter, 50 credits, up to 3,000 AI responses, one domain, and up to 200 prompts per domain. It defines one AI response as one prompt run on one engine, costing 0.015 credits. Digraph lists prompts and brands directly: 30 prompts/one brand on Standard and 300 prompts/three brands on Pro. Do not equate 3,000 responses to a prompt count; multiply the prompt set by engines, markets, and measurement cadence you actually need.

Compare engine breadth and refresh schedule at the selected tier

Am I Cited’s pricing page lists eight engines and says Starter has no daily schedule; daily schedules are listed on Pro and higher. Digraph lists nine AI systems on Standard and Pro. Verify the exact engine names, prompt × engine sampling, and schedule for the chosen plan. Also compare the currencies and annual commitments rather than converting a headline price into an unsupported value-for-money claim.

Include the adjacent SEO and execution workflows

Am I Cited describes a broader suite with search-performance reporting, content tools, MCP, and agents, while Digraph Pro lists audits, analysis, Signal, and agents alongside monitoring. Map the work your team needs beyond measurement—Search Console, content production, reporting, and approvals—and ask which plan includes it and whether it consumes credits. The public product descriptions are vendor claims, not independent evidence of ranking gains.

Run a controlled evaluation

Use the same prompt set, engines, market, language, competitor list, and time period. Record the total prompt × engine runs, actual answers captured, citation fields, credit consumption, schedule, exports, and brands/domains supported. Choose based on the measured workload and evidence your team can inspect, not by comparing non-equivalent headline limits.

Why teams choose Digraph

Digraph brings the evidence behind AI-search visibility into one focused workflow.

Answer-level evidence

Review the prompts and tracked answers where your brand appears—or does not.

Source and competitor context

See cited domains and competing brands alongside the answer patterns you are measuring.

A clear path to investigation

Use the observed gaps to focus research, content planning, and performance review.

Looking for a Am I Cited alternative?

Choose a workflow your team can use with its real questions and evidence—not only a feature checklist.

How does Digraph compare with Am I Cited?

Am I Cited positions AI-answer visibility alongside broader search-performance, content, and agent workflows. Its pricing page meters actions in credits and lists response ceilings, domains, and prompt allowances. Digraph publishes prompt and brand limits and nine AI systems on Standard and Pro. A fair comparison should normalize the prompt × engine runs, schedule, domains or brands, currency, and features the team needs.

What should a team evaluate when comparing Digraph and Am I Cited?

Evaluate the actual prompts your buyers ask, the AI systems and markets you need to cover, whether response and source evidence are available, how competitors are compared, and how a finding becomes a repeatable action for your team.

Can Digraph complement an existing Am I Cited workflow?

Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph is designed to provide an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools already used by SEO, brand, and content teams.

How should I run a fair AI search visibility evaluation?

Use the same defined prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before deciding which workflow is the best fit.

Evaluate with your own questions

The right comparison starts with the prompts, competitors, and markets that matter to your brand. Digraph gives your team a shared place to measure and investigate them.