Digraph vs OtterlyAI pricing
| Plan detail | Digraph | OtterlyAI |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published price | Free for 14 days, then $99/mo | €29/mo |
| Plan and billing | Standard, billed monthly | Lite, Germany display, monthly |
| Allowance | 30 prompts, 1 brand | 15 prompts |
| AI coverage | Supported AI models | 4 included; 3 as add-ons |
| Next plan | Pro $249/mo: 300 prompts, 3 brands | See OtterlyAI’s pricing page |
Lowest published plan for each vendor; billing terms differ. See which AI systems Digraph checks and how.
Features compared
| Capability | Digraph | OtterlyAI |
|---|---|---|
| Published monthly plans | Standard: $99/month for 30 prompts and 1 brand; Pro: $249/month for 300 prompts and 3 brands. | As displayed in Germany on October 3: Lite €29/month for 15 prompts; Standard €189/month for 100; Premium €489/month for 400. Check the checkout currency and tax. |
| Included AI search coverage | Digraph pricing lists supported AI models in Standard and Pro. | OtterlyAI pricing lists ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot as included; AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude as add-ons. |
| Prompt and answer evidence | Organize monitored questions and inspect answer, citation, and competitor context. | OtterlyAI describes stored answers, mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice, competitor benchmarking, and prompt-level gap analysis; verify the exact plan’s evidence and exports. |
| Agency and reporting workflow | Connect visibility observations to source research and follow-up actions. | Standard and Premium list API/MCP access and agent analytics; the agency partner program adds client workspaces, prospect audits, Looker Studio reporting, and expanded prompt allowances. |
Key differences between Digraph and OtterlyAI
Digraph and OtterlyAI both help teams monitor brand visibility in AI answers. Digraph’s public plans list supported AI models in Standard and Pro. OtterlyAI’s pricing page lists four included systems and shows AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude as add-ons. Compare the engines, prompt portfolio, refresh cadence, and answer evidence your team needs; prompt counts and prices alone are not an apples-to-apples test.
Compare the full monthly workload
Official monthly plans were reviewed on October 3, 2026. Digraph lists Standard at $99 for 30 prompts and 1 brand, and Pro at $249 for 300 prompts and 3 brands. In a Germany-based browser session, OtterlyAI displayed Lite at €29 for 15 prompts, Standard at €189 for 100, and Premium at €489 for 400. Its add-on table displayed euro symbols while its caption called the prices US dollars; verify billing currency and tax at checkout. Prompt counts and prices are not equivalent unless the required AI surfaces, refresh cadence, market settings, and evidence capture also match.
Verify engine entitlements at plan level
Digraph’s pricing page lists supported model APIs for Standard and Pro, not direct captures of Google AI Overviews or Microsoft Copilot. OtterlyAI lists ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot as included. In the October 3 Germany display, adding Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude to Standard showed €59, €59, and €109 per month respectively: €416 per month with the €189 base, before tax. Confirm the final currency, engine, plan, and market before comparing the two products.
Run a fair side-by-side pilot
Use the same buyer questions, competitor set, market, language, and measurement window. For each result, check the captured answer, cited URLs, update cadence, and export options. Choose the tool that supports the evidence and workflow your team will actually use, not the largest headline prompt count.
Need the work done, not another tool?
A tracking tool tells you where you stand in AI answers; it does not write the content, fix the site or earn the mentions that change them. Digraph is an AI marketing agency: we measure on our own platform and do that work for you, starting with a one-off audit.
See our AEO agency servicesHow to evaluate both
Run the same defined buyer-question set in both products. Record each AI system and mode, market, language, refresh cadence, answer evidence, citations, competitor fields, and plan entitlement. OtterlyAI’s current public pricing lists 15 prompts on Lite, 100 on Standard, and 400 on Premium, with four included engines and Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude as add-ons; its analytics page describes seven-engine tracking, share of voice, sentiment, citations, gap analysis, reporting, and agency workflows. Compare the full workload and monthly cost rather than treating prompt allowances as equivalent units.
Sources reviewed
OtterlyAI’s capabilities are summarized from the official sources below. This is a documentation-based comparison published by Digraph, not a hands-on benchmark.
Common questions
How does Digraph compare with OtterlyAI?
Digraph and OtterlyAI both help teams monitor brand visibility in AI answers. Digraph’s public plans list supported AI models in Standard and Pro. OtterlyAI’s pricing page lists four included systems and shows AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude as add-ons. Compare the engines, prompt portfolio, refresh cadence, and answer evidence your team needs; prompt counts and prices alone are not an apples-to-apples test.
How does OtterlyAI pricing compare with Digraph?
OtterlyAI’s lowest published plan is €29/mo (Lite, Germany display, monthly) with 15 prompts and 4 included; 3 as add-ons. Digraph starts with a 14-day free trial; Standard is then $99/mo billed monthly for 30 prompts, 1 brand across supported model APIs, and Pro is $249/mo for 300 prompts, 3 brands. Billing basis, collection surfaces, and plan units differ, so confirm current terms with both vendors.
Is Digraph a good OtterlyAI alternative?
Digraph is a fit for teams evaluating AI-search coverage, prompt scale, citation evidence, and monthly plan fit before selecting a monitoring workflow. Run the same buyer prompts in both products and compare the full answers, citations, and next actions before deciding.
Can Digraph complement an existing OtterlyAI workflow?
Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph adds an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools SEO, brand, and content teams already use.
How should I run a fair AI visibility evaluation?
Use the same prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period in each tool. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before choosing a workflow.