Digraph vs Profound
Compare published prices and prompt allowances with Profound’s conversation research, AI traffic analytics, shopping, and agent workflows.
- Profound entry price
- Entry $99/mo
- Profound AI coverage at entry
- ChatGPT only
Pricing, prompt limits, AI engine coverage, and workflow for 34 platforms, sourced from each vendor’s published documentation.
The lowest published plan for the most-evaluated platforms. Check how many AI systems each entry plan actually observes before comparing price.
| Platform | Entry price | Plan and billing | Allowance | AI coverage at entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digraph | $99/mo | Standard, billed monthly | 30 prompts, 1 brand | Supported AI models |
| Profound | $99/mo | Starter, billed yearly | 50 prompts | ChatGPT only |
| Peec AI | €89/mo | Starter | 50 prompts, 1 project | 3 selected models |
| OtterlyAI | €29/mo | Lite, Germany display, monthly | 15 prompts | 4 included; 3 as add-ons |
| Scrunch | $250/mo | Starter, billed yearly ($300 monthly) | 350 custom prompts | 7 AI platforms |
| AthenaHQ | Free | Essential; Starter $295/mo | 300 credits (1 credit = 1 response) | 11 models on Starter |
| Goodie AI | $399/mo | Core | 120 prompts | 5 core models |
| Promptwatch | $95/mo | Essential | 50 prompts, 6,000 responses | 4 tracked models |
| AIclicks | $59/mo | Starter | 30 prompts, 1 website | 3 models of your choice |
| Knowatoa | $59/mo | Starter | Question limit not listed; weekly digest | 7 AI services |
| Writesonic | $79/mo | Starter, billed yearly | 50 prompts, 1 project | 3 AI platforms |
| Ahrefs | From $50/mo | Custom Prompts add-on | User-defined prompts; index is $199/mo | Selected platforms |
| Semrush | $99/mo | AI Visibility Base, per domain, billed yearly | 25 custom prompts | 4 AI surfaces |
Published list prices from each vendor’s pricing page, reviewed between September and October 2026. Billing basis, currencies, and plan units differ, so these figures are not a like-for-like cost comparison. Each linked page shows its sources and review date.
Each page compares plans, AI coverage, evidence, and workflow, then gives a controlled test you can run in both products.
Broad answer-engine programs with analytics, content, or advertising modules and sales-led pricing.
Compare published prices and prompt allowances with Profound’s conversation research, AI traffic analytics, shopping, and agent workflows.
Compare prompt-level visibility, citation influence, collection cadence, AI referrals, bot traffic, and API access using official documentation.
Compare credit-based AI search visibility, model coverage, citation insights, content optimization, competitor monitoring, and enterprise controls using current vendor sources.
Compare closed-loop AEO pricing, prompt and model coverage, citation evidence, revenue attribution, optimization agents, MCP, and agency workspaces using current vendor sources.
Compare Conductor’s AI Search Performance with Digraph’s answer-evidence workflow.
Compare repeated AI-answer sampling and GEO activation with a focused prompt and answer-evidence workflow.
Established SEO or marketing platforms that added AI answer tracking to an existing toolkit.
Compare Ahrefs’ response index and custom checks with Digraph’s scoped answer monitoring.
Compare Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit with Digraph’s focused answer-evidence workflow.
Compare standalone AEO pricing, prompt and answer limits, three-engine coverage, CRM context, citation analysis, and evidence workflows using current vendor sources.
Compare an enterprise SEO suite’s bundled AI module with Digraph’s dedicated model API answer-evidence workflow.
Compare a rank tracker with bundled LLM tracking against Digraph’s dedicated AI answer evidence workflow.
Tracking bundled with AI-written articles, audits, or publishing workflows.
Compare prompt limits, model choice, daily tracking, and bundled AI-written articles against Digraph’s model API coverage.
Compare Writesonic’s SEO-plus-GEO content platform with Digraph’s cross-engine answer evidence and analysis workflow.
Compare a content-engineering platform with AI insights against Digraph’s dedicated AI answer evidence workflow.
Compare GrackerAI and Digraph on AI visibility monitoring, AEO audits, citations, content execution, competitors, agency workflows, and published pricing.
Compare monthly versus annual billing, model and project allowances, answer evidence, and agent-led content workflows using official product sources.
Dedicated prompt and answer monitoring tools, usually self-serve.
Compare prompt and model allowances, competitor setup, source analytics, and workflow fit using current vendor documentation.
Compare official pricing, prompt allowances, AI search coverage, and evidence workflows before a fair product trial.
Compare prompt and response quotas, model coverage, citations, competitor heatmaps, agent credits, AEO content, and API access using current vendor sources.
Compare weekly versus daily cadence, published question limits, and reporting integrations with Digraph.
Compare a high-volume weekly tracker with Digraph’s daily answer evidence and analysis workflow.
Compare credit-based answer volume, engine coverage, citation gaps, page audits, competitor tracking, API access, and agency reporting using current vendor sources.
Compare category-level AI visibility measurement, prompt volume, competitor benchmarks, citations, attribution, and agency delivery using current vendor sources.
Compare daily engine coverage, prompt and brand limits, Search Console access, and the path from a visibility finding to a fix.
Compare credit-metered AI responses and domain limits with prompt-based plans, engine coverage, and answer evidence.
Compare prompt monitoring, GEO implementation tools, engine add-ons, citation evidence, white-label reporting, and agency workflows using current vendor sources.
Compare Foglift and Digraph on AI visibility monitoring, technical audits, citations, competitors, action workflows, developer access, and published pricing.
Compare Prompt Monitor and Digraph on AI visibility tracking, prompt limits, model coverage, competitors, citations, and published pricing.
Compare Citations.io and Digraph on AI visibility tracking, answer evidence, citations, competitors, implementation recommendations, and reporting.
Compare Llumo and Digraph on BYOK economics, AI visibility monitoring, prompts, citations, competitors, API access, and action workflows.
Built around client workspaces, white-label reports, or per-client pricing.
Compare agency pricing, multi-brand capacity, white-label delivery, AI coverage, APIs, and answer evidence using current vendor pages.
Compare persona-driven audits, agency pricing, model coverage, citations, competitors, and answer-level evidence using current vendor sources.
Compare confidence-interval reporting, credit-based plans, agency delivery, citations, competitors, and action workflows using current vendor sources.
Compare multi-business pricing, prompt checks, AI engines, citations, competitors, reporting, and agency delivery using current vendor sources.
Shortlists for teams replacing a specific platform, with the published plan limits that usually prompt the switch.
Entry plan covers ChatGPT only. Multi-engine tracking starts at $399/month.
Three selected models on self-serve plans. Prompt counts scale with projects.
Key engines are add-ons. Entry plan is small.
Higher entry price. Cadence slows after onboarding.
Credits, not prompts. Add-ons for API and extra credits.
25 prompts per domain. Four AI surfaces on the base plan.
Custom prompts are an add-on. Small included prompt counts.
Sales-led, usage-based pricing. Broad platform scope.
A category-level shortlist with plans, scope, and evaluation criteria for each tool.
How to evaluate client workspaces, white-label reporting, and per-client economics.
A matched-question method for comparing answer presence, recommendations, sources, and evidence.
A dated six-query snapshot of Google organic results, with downloadable observations and collection limits.
Feature lists overlap. These three checks separate tools that measure AI answers from tools that explain them.
Use the same buyer prompts, competitors, market, language, and AI systems in every tool. Confirm which engines the plan you would buy actually covers.
Check the full answer, cited URLs, competitor framing, and how each metric is defined. An aggregate score is not a substitute for the answer behind it.
Give each product one verified gap and see whether it helps your team decide, assign, and later re-measure a change.
It depends on the answer surfaces your buyers use, how many prompts and brands you track, and what your team does after a finding. Digraph includes supported model APIs on its public plans from $99/month; configuration, provider access, and successful collection determine actual coverage. For a sourced shortlist, see the best AI visibility tools guide.
Published entry prices in this comparison range from free credit-based tiers to $399/month, and several enterprise platforms are sales-led. Prices are not comparable on their own: plans differ in billing period, prompts or credits, brands, and which AI systems are included. The table above lists each vendor’s entry plan with its billing basis.
Digraph’s collection code supports OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Mistral, and DeepSeek model APIs, subject to configuration, provider access, and successful runs. It does not directly collect Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, or Microsoft Copilot answers; the Copilot-labelled result is an OpenAI proxy. Check the collection-method page and each plan’s current terms before comparing engine counts.
Each head-to-head page summarizes the competitor’s official pricing and product documentation, links to every source, and shows the date it was reviewed. They are documentation-based comparisons published by Digraph, not hands-on benchmarks, so confirm current plans with each vendor before buying.
Yes. Tell us which platform you are evaluating and we will help you run the same buyer prompts in Digraph for a like-for-like trial.
Bring the buyer questions and competitors from your current tool. Digraph shows the full answers, citations, and gaps so you can compare on evidence.