Digraph vs Temso AI

Temso describes AI visibility analytics alongside prompt intelligence, citation analytics, competitor benchmarking, AI-bot analytics, technical audits, content production, and agent workflows. Digraph’s public plans list nine AI systems on Standard and Pro and differentiate prompt and brand limits. A fair evaluation should compare the required model set, billing commitment, project or brand count, evidence access, and what the team needs to do after a visibility gap is found.

Abstract network showing connected sources and answer intelligence — Answer evidence, connected

At a glance

Teams weighing a focused answer-evidence and brand workflow against a broader AI visibility, technical-audit, content, and agent suite.

Capability	Digraph	Temso AI
Entry plan and billing	Standard: $99/month, 30 prompts, 1 brand, and all 9 listed AI systems.	Starter: $89/month billed yearly, 50 prompts, 3 models, 5 content pieces, unlimited projects and users.
Next self-serve plan	Pro: $249/month, 300 prompts, 3 brands, and all 9 listed AI systems.	Growth: $199/month billed yearly, 150 prompts, “all models,” 10 content pieces, unlimited projects and users.
Answer visibility and evidence	Inspect tracked prompts, answers, citations, sources, and competitor context.	Temso describes visibility tracking, citation analytics, prompt intelligence, competitor benchmarking, and AI-bot analytics.
Content and action workflow	Pro lists AI Audit, AI Round Table, Marketing & Technical Analysis, Digraph Signal, and Digraph Agents.	Temso lists AI Agent Analytics and technical audits; its paid plans include content pieces, and Growth adds API and Looker integrations.
Evaluation unit	Plan limits distinguish tracked prompts and brands; all 9 listed systems are included on Standard and Pro.	Temso distinguishes prompt limits and model access by tier; “all models” is the vendor’s wording for higher tiers. Verify exact models, answer volume, and cadence.

Run a useful side-by-side evaluation

This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 15, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Temso’s pricing page lists Starter at $89/month billed yearly for 50 prompts and three models, Growth at $199/month billed yearly for 150 prompts and “all models,” and Professional at $499/month billed yearly for 350 prompts and “all models.” Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and one brand, and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and three brands, with all nine listed AI systems on both. Compare billing period, brands or projects, model entitlements, response limits, refresh cadence, and the actual evidence and actions available in each trial; the headline prompt counts are not equivalent units.

Published by Digraph. Competitor capabilities are summarized from the official sources below, reviewed on 2026-09-15. This is a product-documentation comparison, not a hands-on benchmark. Confirm current plan limits and coverage with each provider.

Review Digraph’s documented features and AI search visibility evaluation guide before building your shortlist.

Compare billing and operating limits together

Temso’s public pricing page displays monthly amounts billed yearly: $89 for Starter, $199 for Growth, and $499 for Professional, with 50, 150, and 350 prompts respectively. Digraph lists monthly Standard at $99 and Pro at $249, with 30 prompts/one brand and 300 prompts/three brands. Temso lists unlimited projects and users on its plans; Digraph specifies brand counts. Because the billing commitments and packaging differ, compare the total annual cost and the number of brands, active models, answers, and teammates your program actually needs.

Check model coverage and evidence at the same scope

Digraph lists nine AI systems on Standard and Pro. Temso lists three models on Starter and “all models” on Growth and Professional; its AI Search Analytics page also describes citation analytics, prompt intelligence, competitor benchmarking, and bot analytics. Ask each vendor to show the exact models and surfaces available to your account, a full answer with its citations, the prompt and date behind it, and the export format. A count of models or prompts does not by itself establish equivalent observation coverage.

Decide how much execution belongs in the platform

Temso positions a broader bundle spanning AI visibility, technical audits, content production, integrations, and agent analytics. Digraph Pro lists analysis and agent modules alongside its monitoring plan. In a pilot, give both teams the same visibility gap and ask them to show the evidence, the proposed next action, approval controls, and how a later measurement would test whether the action helped. Choose based on the workflow your team will use, not an unverified claim of superior results.

Why teams choose Digraph

Digraph brings the evidence behind AI-search visibility into one focused workflow.

Answer-level evidence

Review the prompts and tracked answers where your brand appears—or does not.

Source and competitor context

See cited domains and competing brands alongside the answer patterns you are measuring.

A clear path to investigation

Use the observed gaps to focus research, content planning, and performance review.

Looking for a Temso AI alternative?

Choose a workflow your team can use with its real questions and evidence—not only a feature checklist.

How does Digraph compare with Temso AI?

What should a team evaluate when comparing Digraph and Temso AI?

Evaluate the actual prompts your buyers ask, the AI systems and markets you need to cover, whether response and source evidence are available, how competitors are compared, and how a finding becomes a repeatable action for your team.

Can Digraph complement an existing Temso AI workflow?

Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph is designed to provide an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools already used by SEO, brand, and content teams.

How should I run a fair AI search visibility evaluation?

Use the same defined prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before deciding which workflow is the best fit.

Explore other AI visibility platforms

Explore AI visibility software

Evaluate with your own questions

The right comparison starts with the prompts, competitors, and markets that matter to your brand. Digraph gives your team a shared place to measure and investigate them.

Digraph vs Temso AI

At a glance

Run a useful side-by-side evaluation

Compare billing and operating limits together

Check model coverage and evidence at the same scope

Decide how much execution belongs in the platform

Why teams choose Digraph

Answer-level evidence

Source and competitor context

A clear path to investigation

Looking for a Temso AI alternative?

Explore other AI visibility platforms

Digraph vs Peec AI

Digraph vs Evertune

Digraph vs Profound

Digraph vs Scrunch

Digraph vs Conductor

Digraph vs Semrush

Digraph vs Ahrefs

Digraph vs OtterlyAI

Digraph vs Cituna

Digraph vs Am I Cited

Evaluate with your own questions