Digraph vs Temso AI pricing
| Plan detail | Digraph | Temso AI |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published price | Free for 14 days, then $99/mo | $89/mo |
| Plan and billing | Standard, billed monthly | Starter, billed yearly |
| Allowance | 30 prompts, 1 brand | 50 prompts |
| AI coverage | Supported AI models | 3 models |
| Next plan | Pro $249/mo: 300 prompts, 3 brands | See Temso AI’s pricing page |
Lowest published plan for each vendor; billing terms differ. See which AI systems Digraph checks and how.
Features compared
| Capability | Digraph | Temso AI |
|---|---|---|
| Entry plan and billing | Standard: $99/month, 30 prompts, 1 brand, and supported AI models. | Starter: $89/month billed yearly, 50 prompts, 3 models, 5 content pieces, unlimited projects and users. |
| Next self-serve plan | Pro: $249/month, 300 prompts, 3 brands, and supported AI models. | Growth: $199/month billed yearly, 150 prompts, “all models,” 10 content pieces, unlimited projects and users. |
| Answer visibility and evidence | Inspect tracked prompts, answers, citations, sources, and competitor context. | Temso describes visibility tracking, citation analytics, prompt intelligence, competitor benchmarking, and AI-bot analytics. |
| Content and action workflow | Pro lists AI Audit, AI Round Table, Marketing & Technical Analysis, Digraph Signal, and Digraph Agents. | Temso lists AI Agent Analytics and technical audits; its paid plans include content pieces, and Growth adds API and Looker integrations. |
| Evaluation unit | Plan limits distinguish tracked prompts and brands; supported model APIs are included on Standard and Pro. | Temso distinguishes prompt limits and model access by tier; “all models” is the vendor’s wording for higher tiers. Verify exact models, answer volume, and cadence. |
Key differences between Digraph and Temso AI
Temso describes AI visibility analytics alongside prompt intelligence, citation analytics, competitor benchmarking, AI-bot analytics, technical audits, content production, and agent workflows. Digraph’s public plans list supported AI models on Standard and Pro and differentiate prompt and brand limits. A fair evaluation should compare the required model set, billing commitment, project or brand count, evidence access, and what the team needs to do after a visibility gap is found.
Compare billing and operating limits together
Temso’s public pricing page displays monthly amounts billed yearly: $89 for Starter, $199 for Growth, and $499 for Professional, with 50, 150, and 350 prompts respectively. Digraph lists monthly Standard at $99 and Pro at $249, with 30 prompts/one brand and 300 prompts/three brands. Temso lists unlimited projects and users on its plans; Digraph specifies brand counts. Because the billing commitments and packaging differ, compare the total annual cost and the number of brands, active models, answers, and teammates your program actually needs.
Check model coverage and evidence at the same scope
Digraph lists supported AI models on Standard and Pro. Temso lists three models on Starter and “all models” on Growth and Professional; its AI Search Analytics page also describes citation analytics, prompt intelligence, competitor benchmarking, and bot analytics. Ask each vendor to show the exact models and surfaces available to your account, a full answer with its citations, the prompt and date behind it, and the export format. A count of models or prompts does not by itself establish equivalent observation coverage.
Decide how much execution belongs in the platform
Temso positions a broader bundle spanning AI visibility, technical audits, content production, integrations, and agent analytics. Digraph Pro lists analysis and agent modules alongside its monitoring plan. In a pilot, give both teams the same visibility gap and ask them to show the evidence, the proposed next action, approval controls, and how a later measurement would test whether the action helped. Choose based on the workflow your team will use, not an unverified claim of superior results.
Need the work done, not another tool?
A tracking tool tells you where you stand in AI answers; it does not write the content, fix the site or earn the mentions that change them. Digraph is an AI marketing agency: we measure on our own platform and do that work for you, starting with a one-off audit.
See our AEO agency servicesHow to evaluate both
This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 15, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Temso’s pricing page lists Starter at $89/month billed yearly for 50 prompts and three models, Growth at $199/month billed yearly for 150 prompts and “all models,” and Professional at $499/month billed yearly for 350 prompts and “all models.” Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and one brand, and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and three brands, with supported AI models on both. Compare billing period, brands or projects, model entitlements, response limits, refresh cadence, and the actual evidence and actions available in each trial; the headline prompt counts are not equivalent units.
Sources reviewed
Temso AI’s capabilities are summarized from the official sources below. This is a documentation-based comparison published by Digraph, not a hands-on benchmark.
Common questions
How does Digraph compare with Temso AI?
Temso describes AI visibility analytics alongside prompt intelligence, citation analytics, competitor benchmarking, AI-bot analytics, technical audits, content production, and agent workflows. Digraph’s public plans list supported AI models on Standard and Pro and differentiate prompt and brand limits. A fair evaluation should compare the required model set, billing commitment, project or brand count, evidence access, and what the team needs to do after a visibility gap is found.
How does Temso AI pricing compare with Digraph?
Temso AI’s lowest published plan is $89/mo (Starter, billed yearly) with 50 prompts and 3 models. Digraph starts with a 14-day free trial; Standard is then $99/mo billed monthly for 30 prompts, 1 brand across supported model APIs, and Pro is $249/mo for 300 prompts, 3 brands. Billing basis, collection surfaces, and plan units differ, so confirm current terms with both vendors.
Is Digraph a good Temso AI alternative?
Digraph is a fit for teams weighing a focused answer-evidence and brand workflow against a broader AI visibility, technical-audit, content, and agent suite. Run the same buyer prompts in both products and compare the full answers, citations, and next actions before deciding.
Can Digraph complement an existing Temso AI workflow?
Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph adds an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools SEO, brand, and content teams already use.
How should I run a fair AI visibility evaluation?
Use the same prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period in each tool. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before choosing a workflow.