Digraph vs Rank Prompt pricing
| Plan detail | Digraph | Rank Prompt |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published price | Free for 14 days, then $99/mo | $149/mo |
| Plan and billing | Standard, billed monthly | Agency |
| Allowance | 30 prompts, 1 brand | Up to 500 brands |
| AI coverage | Supported AI models | Confirm by plan |
| Next plan | Pro $249/mo: 300 prompts, 3 brands | See Rank Prompt’s pricing page |
Lowest published plan for each vendor; billing terms differ. See which AI systems Digraph checks and how.
Features compared
| Capability | Digraph | Rank Prompt |
|---|---|---|
| Published agency pricing | Pro: $249/month for 300 prompts, 3 brands, and 10 users; Enterprise is custom-priced. | Agency: $149/month; Agency Plus: $299/month. Public pages also show annual billing discounts; confirm the current billing selector and entitlements. |
| Portfolio capacity | Pro lists 3 brands; Enterprise lists unlimited brands. | Agency lists up to 500 brands; Agency Plus lists up to 1,000 brands. |
| AI-system coverage | Standard and Pro list supported AI models. | Agency pages name ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Claude, and Google AI Mode/AI Overviews; confirm exact plan coverage and cadence. |
| Client delivery | Digraph supports evidence-led reports and exports; confirm the required client-facing permissions and branding for the selected plan. | The agency pages describe white-label reports, branded delivery, prospecting, and a client portal on Agency Plus. |
| API and automation | API access is listed for Enterprise; public plans list exports and reports. | Rank Prompt documents REST API, MCP, and webhooks from paid plans, with request caps by tier. |
| Answer investigation | Inspect prompts, answers, citations, source domains, recommendations, and competitor context, then route the finding into analysis and action workflows. | Rank Prompt describes mentions, citations, share of answer, competitor intelligence, reporting, and action plans; inspect the underlying answer and source fields during a trial. |
Key differences between Digraph and Rank Prompt
Rank Prompt is positioned around agencies that sell AI visibility services, with white-label reporting, multi-brand plans, prospecting, and an agency dashboard. Digraph is positioned around prompt-level answer evidence, citations, competitors, and an action workflow for teams operating an AI-search visibility program. The strongest choice depends on whether the primary constraint is client-portfolio delivery or depth of investigation per tracked brand and question.
The plans are built around different units
Digraph publishes prompt and brand limits: Pro lists 300 tracked prompts, 3 brands, and supported AI models at $249/month. Rank Prompt’s agency pages emphasize portfolio capacity: Agency lists up to 500 brands at $149/month, while Agency Plus lists up to 1,000 brands at $299/month and adds an agency dashboard and client portal. A brand count is not a prompt or response count. Before comparing value, model the actual number of client brands, prompts, engines, markets, runs, users, and reports your agency will operate.
Rank Prompt is designed for white-label agency delivery
Rank Prompt’s agency pages describe white-label reports and branded delivery, prospecting, team collaboration, and a client portal on Agency Plus. That can fit an agency whose product is a recurring client-facing service. Ask for the full workflow: create a prospect snapshot, restrict client access, deliver a report under your brand, export the evidence, and schedule the next measurement. Confirm which features are included at the tier you would actually buy.
Digraph centers the evidence behind the answer
Digraph’s public product materials emphasize the tracked question, full answer, citations, source domains, competitor context, and follow-up analysis. That can fit teams that need to explain why an answer changed or turn a citation gap into a bounded SEO, content, accuracy, or authority investigation. Do not infer that a broader brand allowance provides the same answer-level review; open the underlying response, cited URL, metric definition, and export in both products.
API and operating economics deserve a separate test
Rank Prompt documents REST API, MCP, and webhooks on paid plans with tiered request caps. Digraph lists API access on Enterprise and reports/exports on public plans. If an agency needs automated onboarding, client portals, custom reporting, or downstream workflows, test the exact API fields, request limits, authentication scope, webhooks, retention, and branded output. Include analyst time and client delivery effort in the total cost—not just the subscription price.
Run a controlled side-by-side pilot
Use one or two representative client brands and a fixed set of discovery, comparison, recommendation, and accuracy prompts. Match the market, language, competitors, active engines, collection schedule, and measurement window. For every result, record the full answer, brand role, competitor mentions, citations, cited URLs, source domains, and export format. Then test the client-facing report and the next action. Public feature descriptions are vendor claims, not independent evidence of ranking or revenue gains.
Need the work done, not another tool?
A tracking tool tells you where you stand in AI answers; it does not write the content, fix the site or earn the mentions that change them. Digraph is an AI marketing agency: we measure on our own platform and do that work for you, starting with a one-off audit.
See our AEO agency servicesHow to evaluate both
This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 15, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Rank Prompt’s agency pages describe an Agency plan at $149/month with up to 500 brands, white-label reports, team collaboration, and API access, plus Agency Plus at $299/month with up to 1,000 brands and a client portal. Digraph lists Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts, 3 brands, with supported model APIs. These plans measure different units and serve different operating models. Compare the same prompts, engines, markets, answer evidence, users, client access, exports, and delivery workload before choosing.
Sources reviewed
Rank Prompt’s capabilities are summarized from the official sources below. This is a documentation-based comparison published by Digraph, not a hands-on benchmark.
Common questions
How does Digraph compare with Rank Prompt?
Rank Prompt is positioned around agencies that sell AI visibility services, with white-label reporting, multi-brand plans, prospecting, and an agency dashboard. Digraph is positioned around prompt-level answer evidence, citations, competitors, and an action workflow for teams operating an AI-search visibility program. The strongest choice depends on whether the primary constraint is client-portfolio delivery or depth of investigation per tracked brand and question.
How does Rank Prompt pricing compare with Digraph?
Rank Prompt’s lowest published plan is $149/mo (Agency) with up to 500 brands and confirm by plan. Digraph starts with a 14-day free trial; Standard is then $99/mo billed monthly for 30 prompts, 1 brand across supported model APIs, and Pro is $249/mo for 300 prompts, 3 brands. Billing basis, collection surfaces, and plan units differ, so confirm current terms with both vendors.
Is Digraph a good Rank Prompt alternative?
Digraph is a fit for agencies comparing a portfolio-oriented white-label platform with a focused evidence workflow for prompts, answers, citations, competitors, and follow-up actions. Run the same buyer prompts in both products and compare the full answers, citations, and next actions before deciding.
Can Digraph complement an existing Rank Prompt workflow?
Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph adds an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools SEO, brand, and content teams already use.
How should I run a fair AI visibility evaluation?
Use the same prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period in each tool. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before choosing a workflow.