Digraph vs Scope pricing
| Plan detail | Digraph | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published price | Free for 14 days, then $99/mo | $25/mo |
| Plan and billing | Standard, billed monthly | Starter |
| Allowance | 30 prompts, 1 brand | 1 business |
| AI coverage | Supported AI models | Confirm by plan |
| Next plan | Pro $249/mo: 300 prompts, 3 brands | See Scope’s pricing page |
Lowest published plan for each vendor; billing terms differ. See which AI systems Digraph checks and how.
Features compared
| Capability | Digraph | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Published entry pricing | Standard: $99/month for 30 tracked prompts and 1 brand. | Starter: $25/month for 1 business; the public agency page describes a 7-day trial and launch pricing. |
| Multi-business plan | Pro: $249/month for 300 prompts and 3 brands; Enterprise is custom-priced with unlimited brands. | Growth: from $79/month with unlimited businesses, shared prompt checks, 8+ engines, and unlimited team members on the public pricing and agency pages. |
| Prompt and engine scope | Standard and Pro list supported AI models and publish prompt limits. | Starter lists 100 prompt checks monthly across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity; Growth publishes adjustable monthly checks and every engine, including Google AI, Copilot, and Grok. |
| Competitor and citation context | Inspect answers, recommendations, competitor mentions, cited URLs, source domains, and changes over time. | Scope describes competitor intelligence, citation intelligence, visibility score history, and prioritized action plans; inspect the underlying answer and source fields in a trial. |
| Agency reporting and white-labeling | Reports and exports are listed on public plans; API access is listed for Enterprise. | The agency page says client-ready reports but no current white-labeling; a separate billing page lists an Agency tier with white-label reports for 10 businesses. Confirm which page and plan are current. |
| Automation and access | Pro lists audit, analysis, Signal, and agent modules; API access is Enterprise. | Scope describes unlimited seats, AI Optimization Agent, read-only MCP on Starter, and CMS Connect, crawler logs, MCP, and CLI access on Growth. |
Key differences between Digraph and Scope
Scope and Digraph both monitor how AI systems recommend brands, compare competitors, and expose cited sources. Scope emphasizes an accessible visibility score, multi-business plans, daily updates, an AI Optimization Agent, and agency workflows. Digraph emphasizes a defined prompt portfolio, answer-level evidence, citations, competitors, and connected analysis. Scope’s public agency and billing pages disagree about an Agency tier and white-label support; confirm those details before purchase.
The headline prices measure different workloads
Scope’s public agency and pricing pages describe Starter at $25/month for one business and Growth from $79/month for unlimited businesses, while Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and one brand and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and three brands. A business slot is not a prompt allowance. Calculate the prompts, engines, markets, collection cadence, answer storage, and users your team needs before comparing the monthly totals.
Resolve the Scope plan and white-label discrepancy
Scope’s agency page says Growth supports agencies with unlimited businesses and explicitly says Scope does not currently offer white-labeling. Its separate billing-and-plans page lists an Agency plan at $249/month for 10 businesses with white-label, client reports, and team management. Treat those as conflicting public claims. Ask Scope for the current plan matrix, effective date, business limit, white-label status, and whether reports are branded or simply exportable.
Compare score simplicity with answer evidence
Scope positions a 0–100 visibility score, competitor gaps, daily updates, and prioritized action plans as an easy client story. Digraph’s public materials emphasize the prompt, full answer, cited URL, source domain, competitor context, and follow-up analysis behind a finding. Use the same buyer questions in both products and record how a reviewer moves from an aggregate score to the actual answer and source that created it.
Test the agency workflow end to end
Scope describes unlimited seats, multi-business dashboards, client-ready reports, an Optimization Agent, and MCP or CLI access on higher plans. Digraph lists three brands on Pro and unlimited brands on Enterprise, with public-plan reports and exports. Test onboarding, permissions, client separation, exports, API or MCP fields, scheduling, and the effort needed to explain a missed recommendation without over-promising a ranking.
Run a controlled side-by-side pilot
Use the same brand, competitors, markets, language, prompt set, active engines, collection window, and reporting format. Record full answers, score definitions, brand position, competitor mentions, citations, cited URLs, source domains, refresh time, checks consumed, and exports. Compare one recurring report and one verified follow-up action before choosing the operating model.
Need the work done, not another tool?
A tracking tool tells you where you stand in AI answers; it does not write the content, fix the site or earn the mentions that change them. Digraph is an AI marketing agency: we measure on our own platform and do that work for you, starting with a one-off audit.
See our AEO agency servicesHow to evaluate both
This documentation-based comparison was reviewed September 21, 2026; it is not a hands-on benchmark. Scope’s public agency page describes Starter at $25/month for one business and Growth at $79/month with unlimited businesses, shared prompt checks, 8+ AI platforms, and unlimited seats, while its knowledge-base billing page also lists an Agency plan at $249/month for 10 businesses with white-label reporting. The agency page says Scope does not currently offer white-labeling, so plan and page differences should be resolved with the vendor. Digraph lists Standard at $99/month for 30 prompts and 1 brand and Pro at $249/month for 300 prompts and 3 brands across supported model APIs. Normalize businesses, prompt checks, engines, cadence, evidence, client delivery, and current billing terms before comparing value.
Sources reviewed
Scope’s capabilities are summarized from the official sources below. This is a documentation-based comparison published by Digraph, not a hands-on benchmark.
Common questions
How does Digraph compare with Scope?
Scope and Digraph both monitor how AI systems recommend brands, compare competitors, and expose cited sources. Scope emphasizes an accessible visibility score, multi-business plans, daily updates, an AI Optimization Agent, and agency workflows. Digraph emphasizes a defined prompt portfolio, answer-level evidence, citations, competitors, and connected analysis. Scope’s public agency and billing pages disagree about an Agency tier and white-label support; confirm those details before purchase.
How does Scope pricing compare with Digraph?
Scope’s lowest published plan is $25/mo (Starter) with 1 business and confirm by plan. Digraph starts with a 14-day free trial; Standard is then $99/mo billed monthly for 30 prompts, 1 brand across supported model APIs, and Pro is $249/mo for 300 prompts, 3 brands. Billing basis, collection surfaces, and plan units differ, so confirm current terms with both vendors.
Is Digraph a good Scope AI Visibility alternative?
Digraph is a fit for teams and agencies comparing a low-entry, multi-business visibility score workflow with a prompt-centered evidence and investigation workflow. Run the same buyer prompts in both products and compare the full answers, citations, and next actions before deciding.
Can Digraph complement an existing Scope workflow?
Yes. Many teams use more than one research or measurement system. Digraph adds an evidence-led view of AI answers, prompts, citations, competitors, and follow-up work alongside the tools SEO, brand, and content teams already use.
How should I run a fair AI visibility evaluation?
Use the same prompt portfolio, competitors, markets, AI systems, and reporting period in each tool. Review the underlying answers and sources, not only aggregate scores, before choosing a workflow.